Protect Vaccine Choice in Connecticut

Many states have laws that allow patients to exempt themselves from vaccinations based on personal, philosophical, or religious beliefs. That way, parents who are wary of government-mandated vaccination schedules can make their own informed decisions about their family’s health.

But the Connecticut legislature is considering bills, SB 568 and HB 6423, that eliminate the religious belief exemption to vaccination.

Other bills protect freedom of choice: HB 5578 adds moral and philosophical objections as an exemption to the immunization requirements; SB 405 prohibits the state of Connecticut from mandating a vaccine that only has been given emergency use authorization from the FDA; HB 5402 prohibits employers from requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination as condition of employment; and HB 5401 prohibits the State of Connecticut or any employee of the state from mandating a COVID-19 vaccine.

We must not lose our freedom to make informed choices about vaccines. Contact your state legislators and tell them to protect vaccine choice!

Recipients

Your State Senator or Senators
Your State Representative or Representatives

Contact

*Required fields

* Title:

* First Name:

* Last Name:

* Your Email:

* Address 1:

Address 2:

* City:

* State / Province:

* ZIP / Postal Code:

* Phone Number:

Yes, I would like to receive periodic updates and communications from Alliance for Natural Health USA.

Remember me. What's this?

Message

Please protect vaccine choice

Dear [Decision Maker],

* Personalize your message

I understand bills have been introduced, SB 568 and HB 6423, that eliminate the religious belief exemption to vaccination.

This raises a number of concerns for parents, children, and patients in general.

Parents have a right to make their own decisions about treatments for their children based on informed consent. Limiting a patient's ability to make informed decisions about what gets put into his or her body violates medical ethics.

I am very troubled by some of the ingredients that are used in vaccines, such as aluminum. Aluminum is a dangerous neurotoxin, and federal regulators have not done testing to ensure that the amount of aluminum being injected into children is safe. At the same time, there is a growing amount of data to show that aluminum can accumulate in the brain, spleen, and lymph nodes. We don't know what the long term damage could be.

Questions of safety make it unethical to eliminate exemptions to vaccines. Despite the widely touted belief that the link between vaccines and autism has been "debunked," researchers found 83 cases of autism among those compensated by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program for vaccine-induced brain damage. There have also been no safety tests to determine what specific level of aluminum (a common vaccine adjuvant) is safe to inject into young children. The most up-to-date science has demonstrated the aluminum, which is a neurotoxin, collects in the brain after it is injected. With these safety considerations in mind, it would be unwise and unethical to restrict an individual's right to refuse a vaccine.

Current law protects both my family's health and our right to make our own healthcare choices, and I call upon you to oppose SB 568, HB 6423, and ANY legislation that would restrict freedom of choice.

Other bills protect freedom of choice, and I ask that you support them: HB 5578 adds moral and philosophical objections as an exemption to the immunization requirements; SB 405 prohibits the state of Connecticut from mandating a vaccine that only has been given emergency use authorization from the FDA; HB 5402 prohibits employers from requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination as condition of employment; and HB 5401 prohibits the State of Connecticut or any employee of the state from mandating a COVID-19 vaccine.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State ZIP]
[Your Email]