Skip to content

Support an End to Cosmetics Safety Testing on Animals in Your State

Support an End to Cosmetics Safety Testing on Animals in Your State

Name: Ban on Using Animals for Cosmetics Safety Testing

It has been recognized that the use of animals in safety testing for cosmetics does not necessarily create safer products. There are many safety tests that are scientifically superior and more reliable than those that use animals. Moreover, alternative tests have been in use by the cosmetics industry for more than a decade.

California, New Jersey, New York and Virginia already have state laws in place. Massachusetts is considering the passage of legislation this session. In addition, California   just passed a law to prohibit the sale of cosmetics in the state that were tested on animals outside of the state.

While it would be ideal to pass the federal Humane Cosmetics Act, which would end the use of animals for cosmetics testing across the U.S., animals cannot wait on the inaction of Congress.  Please ask your state legislators to consider introducing a bill in your state during the  2019 legislative session to end cosmetics safety testing on animals, as well as to end the sale of animal-tested products.


Call to Actions:

  1. Please contact your State Senator and Representative and urge them to introduce this important piece of legislation.
  2. Spread the word! Share this page with your social network.



  • Your State Senator or Senators
  • Your State Representative or Representatives


*Required fields

If you take action and have not already registered, you will receive periodic updates and communications from National Anti-Vivisection Society.


Please Support the Use of Non-Animal Alternatives for Cosmetics Safety Testing in 2019

Dear [Decision Maker],

I am writing to ask you to consider introducing legislation to end the use of animals for cosmetics safety testing in our state during the 2019 legislative session. It is unconscionable that animals are still used in this way. There are numerous alternative toxicity testing methods--including cell cultures and computer simulations--that have proven to be effective and are already widely used by the cosmetics industry.

With current scientific advancements, non-animal tests are more reliable, effective and humane than archaic animal tests that were developed in the last century. In fact, most cosmetics companies already use non-animal safety testing methods. The adoption of a state law will give additional companies a push to stop relying on animal tests and allow us to join California, New Jersey, New York and Virginia, as well as many countries around the world that have already taken this step.

For your convenience, I have included a copy of a model law below. Please consider introducing this or a similar bill during the 2019 legislative session.

Model Law Banning the Use of Animals for Cosmetics Safety Testing

1. Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

"Cosmetic'' has the meaning given such term in 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321).

"Cosmetic animal testing'' means the internal or external application or exposure of any cosmetic to the skin, eyes or other body part of a live non-human vertebrate for purposes of evaluating the safety or efficacy of a cosmetic.

2. Prohibited conduct.

a. No person shall conduct or contract for cosmetic animal testing. This prohibition becomes effective one year after passage of this Act.

b. No person shall sell, offer for sale, or transport within the State after two years of passage of this Act, any cosmetic if the final product or any component thereof was developed or manufactured using cosmetic animal testing that was conducted or contracted for after the effective date of this Act.

3. Civil penalties.

a. Any person violating any provision of this chapter shall be assessed a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation. Each violation of this chapter with respect to a separate animal, and each day that a violation of this chapter continues, constitutes a separate offense.

b. In determining the amount of any civil penalty, due consideration shall be given to (i) the person's history of previous violations; (ii) the seriousness of the violation; and (iii) the demonstrated good faith of the person charged in attempting to achieve compliance with the chapter or regulation adopted thereunder after notification of the violation.

Thank you for your consideration.

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State ZIP]